The competition between manufacturing companies every day not only does not fade away, but, on the contrary, is gaining momentum. In the pursuit of leadership and customer preference, technologists are adding more and more functions, changing the appearance and materials, and so on. The most popular manufacturers of multicookers are Redmond and Polaris. Consider the differences in the products of these firms.

Content
Acquaintance with brands
Polaris has over 260 multicooker models on sale at the moment. Production is located not only in Russia, but also in Italy, China and Israel. The advantages of this brand are the following:
- stylish design;
- ease of use and maintenance of equipment;
- in comparison with other manufacturers, fairly adequate prices;
- excellent build quality;
- long service life;
- a light weight;
- economical consumption of electricity;
- Russified display.
Judging by the reviews of the owners, the technique is really functional and practical, but sometimes there are problems with touch control.
The spread of prices for various models in the range of 3000 - 16000 rubles.

Redmond is the brainchild of Americans. At the same time, production facilities are located in other countries - China, Poland and Russia. The company won first place in popularity among multicooker manufacturers.
The advantages of the products include:
- large set of functions;
- assembly reliability;
- long service life;
- Russified display.
Some consumers believe that the prices of the company's products are unreasonably high. This is also attributed to the initial smell that a new technique emits during cooking - scorched rubber. Of course, after a while it disappears, but for the first time cooking in it is not very pleasant.
The price range for different models of multicookers from this manufacturer is in the range of 3000 - 13000 rubles.

Each has its own characteristics, pros and cons. Since comparing the firms themselves is a completely useless exercise to find out which slow cooker is better: Redmond or Polaris, it is best to compare specific models.
Comparison of multicookers REDMOND RMC-M22 and Polaris PMC 0511AD
These models are in about the same price category and visually similar to each other. The price for these models Polaris and Redmond an average of about 4000 rubles.
So, let's start with the general characteristics. The following is a comparison table.
| Characteristic | Redmond | Polaris |
| Bowl cover | Ceramics | Ceramics |
| Body material | Metal | Metal |
| Power | 860W | 650W |
| Volume | 5 liters | 5 liters |
| Control | Electronic | Electronic |
| Programs | 10. Among them are baking, porridge, cereals, stewing, steaming, pilaf, frying, yogurt, pasteurization | 12. Among them are pastries, cereal, cereals, stewing, steaming, pilaf, frying |
| Additional functions | Multi-cook, heat, delayed start, timer for the day | Multi-cook, heat, delayed start, timer for the day |
| Equipment | Cookbook (120 recipes), two spoons, measuring cup, additional container for steaming | Cookbook (100 recipes), two spoons, measuring cup, additional container for steaming |
Now we will analyze each item in more detail.
Appearance and spaciousness
As we can see from the table, both models are made of metal. This means that the housing of both is robust and easy to care for.
The displacement is also identical - 5 liters. Ceramic bowl coating on both models.
So, according to the initial parameters, the Redmond and Polaris models are identical.
What do we see when considering multicookers?
Polaris has a fairly large display, which displays time and temperature, seven buttons. Tools for manual adjustment of time and temperature are located below. There are convenient handles on the bowl.The metal case is silver, and the bottom and lid on the outside are black.

The Redmond model has a smaller display, eight buttons. Adjustment of time and temperature under the display. Only cooking time is displayed on it, and a light lights up near the name of the selected program. The model is presented in two colors of plastic - black and white. The metal part of the case in both cases is silver.

Power and programs
The power of the Polaris multicooker is slightly inferior - 650W. This means that the cooking process in it will be a little longer.
In both models there is a multi-product. And this means that the unit itself will regulate the temperature depending on the program, which will facilitate the task of the hostess.
The number of programs in the models is different.
| Redmond | Polaris |
| Bakery products | Bakery products |
| Porridge | Porridge |
| Groats | Groats |
| Quenching | Quenching |
| Steaming | Steaming |
| Pilaf | Pilaf |
| Frying | Frying |
| Yogurt | — |
| Pasteurization | — |
According to the results of comparing the functionality of multicookers, it becomes clear that Redmond wins in terms of the number of functions.
Of course, at one price I want to get more features. But the added programs “yogurt” and “pasteurization” are far from necessary for everyone.
Given the above data, it will probably be difficult to choose which is better - the Polaris or Redmond multicooker.
Equipment
It is immediately clear that the manufacturers Redmond and Polaris are the same in terms of configuration. The only difference between them is the number of recipes in the cookbooks. The difference is as much as 20 recipes. In fact, given the presence of the Internet in every home, and on its expanses of many culinary sites, this difference does not mean anything.
If you look at the rating of assistants, Redmond scored more positive ratings than Polaris.
Summarize
Based on all the above characteristics, we can conclude that comparing multicookers Redmond and Polaris is not so simple. Models in about the same price category, decent functionality, but still there is a difference. Outwardly, they are very similar in terms of build quality and reliability on an equal footing. It turns out that the number of functions and positive reviews of the Redmond multicooker wins. But before you buy it, you need to think in any case and be based on your preferences and the availability of the necessary functions, and not on the brand.